Pilot candidate library

Better AI pilots are hiding in ordinary work.

Start with work that repeats, uses information your team can approve and leaves a visible decision with a person. The best first pilot is rarely the most futuristic idea in the room.

These candidates are prompts for discovery, not pre-packaged products. The workflow still has to earn its place.

What makes a good first pilot

Valuable enough to matter. Bounded enough to test.

A use case is promising when the team can inspect both the work and the result. A flashy idea with no owner, no baseline or no safe failure path is not ready.

01

Repeated

The work happens often enough to learn from several real examples.

02

Inspectible

A knowledgeable person can tell whether an output is useful, wrong or incomplete.

03

Sourceable

The information and system path can be approved and made visible.

04

Owned

A sponsor and workflow owner can make the stop, revise or proceed decision.

05

Bounded

A mistake can be caught before it creates an unacceptable consequence.

06

Measurable

There is a baseline for time, quality, delay, rework, risk or experience.

Voice agents

A useful voice pilot has a short job and an easy way out.

Voice can remove waiting and repetitive capture, but it raises the standard for disclosure, latency, accuracy and human hand-off. Start with a narrow conversation that can be tested end to end.

01 / INBOUND

Front desk and enquiry capture

Answer a defined set of routine questions, capture the reason for the call and route or book the next step.

02 / ASSIST

Call summary and next action

Turn an approved recording or transcript into a structured summary, action list and draft follow-up for human review.

03 / QUALITY

Conversation review

Check calls against a clear service rubric, surface examples and help a human coach focus their attention.

First boundary: the agent identifies itself where required, handles silence and uncertainty, offers a human path, records what happened and does not make a payment, contractual, employment or other high-consequence commitment.

Where to look

Nine functions. Thirty-six plausible starting points.

The Opportunity Map compares candidates across value, feasibility, data, risk and adoption. It may recommend one of these, reshape it or show that a simpler process fix should happen first.

01

Sales & growth

  • Sourced account and opportunity briefs
  • Proposal and tender first drafts from approved material
  • Meeting summaries with owned next actions
  • Market-signal triage against the current account record
USEFUL FIRST TEST

Can a sourced first draft reduce preparation time without lowering quality?

CONTROL BOUNDARY

People keep ownership of relationship judgement, price, capability and every external commitment.

02

Customer service

  • Service inbox classification and routing
  • Response drafts grounded in policy and case history
  • Case summaries and next-step preparation
  • A voice front desk for routine enquiry capture and hand-off
USEFUL FIRST TEST

Can the system route routine enquiries correctly and leave the agent with a useful brief?

CONTROL BOUNDARY

Escalation stays visible. The system does not make disputed, financial or high-consequence decisions.

03

HR & employee experience

  • Policy answers with the approved source attached
  • Onboarding coordination across people and systems
  • Employee service request triage
  • Theme summaries from approved, de-identified feedback
USEFUL FIRST TEST

Can employees get a reliable answer or the right human owner without chasing several teams?

CONTROL BOUNDARY

Employment, performance, pay and candidate decisions remain with authorised people.

04

Operations

  • Exception triage for human review
  • Shift, job and handover summaries
  • Procedure guidance from the controlled SOP set
  • Dispatch and work-order preparation
USEFUL FIRST TEST

Can one common exception reach the right person with the evidence already assembled?

CONTROL BOUNDARY

The owner approves consequential schedule, safety, customer and resource changes.

05

Supply chain & procurement

  • Supplier submission and tender comparison
  • Purchase-order, delivery and invoice exception checks
  • Supplier risk and due-diligence briefs
  • Stock, delay and dependency summaries
USEFUL FIRST TEST

Can the system find and explain a defined class of mismatch before it becomes rework?

CONTROL BOUNDARY

Supplier selection, contractual acceptance and financial approval stay with named owners.

06

Reporting & finance

  • Recurring management pack assembly
  • Variance commentary linked to source figures
  • Evidence-backed executive briefing
  • Invoice and reconciliation exception preparation
USEFUL FIRST TEST

Can a repeatable pack be assembled faster while every number remains traceable?

CONTROL BOUNDARY

The system prepares and explains. It does not post entries, approve payments or invent missing figures.

07

Risk & compliance

  • Regulatory and policy change monitoring
  • Case-file completeness checks
  • Control-evidence collection and indexing
  • Incident intake, classification and briefing
USEFUL FIRST TEST

Can a reviewer reach the evidence and open questions without reconstructing the file?

CONTROL BOUNDARY

AI does not make a legal conclusion or close a material issue. Uncertainty and missing evidence stay visible.

08

Knowledge & leadership

  • Answers from an approved internal knowledge set
  • Executive briefs that separate fact from inference
  • Decision records and action follow-through
  • Research monitoring with source and date checks
USEFUL FIRST TEST

Can leaders get a compact answer with enough evidence to challenge it?

CONTROL BOUNDARY

A polished summary is never treated as proof. Material claims keep their source and verification state.

09

IT & internal service

  • Service-desk intake and ticket enrichment
  • Incident timelines and handover summaries
  • Change-request completeness checks
  • Access-request preparation against approved rules
USEFUL FIRST TEST

Can routine intake reach the technical team complete enough to act on?

CONTROL BOUNDARY

Privilege, production change and security decisions remain inside existing approval controls.

Often not first

Do not learn on the consequence.

A first pilot should not make high-impact employment decisions, send unchecked commitments, move money, change production access or give advice where a confident error cannot be caught safely.

That does not mean these areas can never use AI. It means the first useful system is more likely to prepare evidence, check completeness, route an exception or assist the accountable person.

A practical first conversation

Which job deserves a closer look?

Bring one repeated workflow or a list of competing ideas. We will help decide what is testable, what needs readiness work and what should stay human.

Start with the workflow